Affordable Solar Electric via Feed-in Tariffs?

The National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) reports that feed-in tariffs are responsible for 75% of solar photovoltaic and 45% of wind projects worldwide.  Feed-in tariffs (FITs) require utilities to pay per kilowatt-hour to purchase electricity from renewable energy generators.  They enable stable and reliable pricing, and small generators and large plants have an equal opportunity to compete. Countries in Europe, especially Germany, France, and Spain, have used feed-in tariffs to greatly increase renewable energy production because of their increased cost-effectiveness.  For example, California receives 70% more sunlight for producing solar energy than Germany does, though the latter installs 15 times as many solar electric systems per year due to the effective use of FITs.

Generally, green markets in the United States lack strong federal support, and instead, progressive states like California create markets and regulations that eventually spread to the rest of the country.  Though many states have established FITs before, institutional resistance, too high or too low pricing, and bureaucracy have rendered them virtually ineffective. California is again taking the lead and has recently proposed to launch a new variation of the tariff.  In California, investor-owned utilities will be required to purchase electrical energy from renewable generators that are 1MW-20MW in size.

New York recently pushed a bill for FITs on Long Island, but it did not pass. The Long Island Power Authority (LIPA) already awards large rebates (up to half of system cost!), and the 25% New York State and 30% federal tax credits have already made solar systems incredibly cost-effective.  We can only hope that pushes for cost-effectiveness like the FIT can get the United States on par with our European friends.

Energy Stimulus Money Slow to Spend, But Making Strides for Solar on Long Island and New York State

Of the $3.2 billion that the economic stimulus package of 2009 allocated towards energy efficiency and conservation, only 8.4% had been spent as of the beginning of this month.  An Audit Report was released by the Department of Energy last week examining the status of funds granted to the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program under the Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  The DOE disbursed most of the available funds for projects that would increase energy efficiency and reduce energy use and fossil fuel emissions.  However, after a year only $269.7 million had been spent, producing or saving just 2,265 jobs.

http://www.ig.energy.gov/documents/OAS-RA-10-16.pdf

Why the delays in spending?  Low levels of spending and job creation were clearly not the desired outcome of this program.  But the one-year analysis found impediments to implementation including administrative and regulatory issues at the federal, state, and local levels.  A shortage of Department staff and abundance of federal controls have made it difficult for local governments to spend money as planned.  More details on these issues can be found in the status report.

The Department of Energy had the chance to respond to this audit and argued that the program was more successful than made to appear by this report; much of the money has actually been committed to projects so there is promise of spending in the near future.

What does this mean for solar? Although most stimulus grants for renewable energy technologies are given through other areas, like the State Energy Program leg of the Recovery Act, the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block includes solar power on government buildings.  According to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) and Governor Paterson back in March 2010, $24 million of this block funding was awarded for clean energy projects in small municipalities across New York state.  Plans for this money included both solar photovoltaic and thermal systems on various facilities including fire stations, libraries, and town halls.  Here is the breakdown of funds for Long Island:

http://www.nyserda.org/economicrecovery/documents/rfp10_awardees.pdf

It’s great to see that New York municipalities are on board and in many cases leading the mission of spreading solar energy and efficiency!

56,000 Leafs Pre-ordered and Renewable Energy

At the Geneva Auto Show, the CEO and President of Renault-Nissan Carlos Ghosn said that there have already been 56,000 orders for the Leaf in the United States, according to Business Week.  Ghosn went on to claim that the Leaf will be the only market-ready vehicle in 2011 and would have very little competition.  The people working on the Volt may disagree, but it is true that Nissan is making aggressive moves including being part of the largest EV infrastructure project in the U.S.

Ghosn’s statement is most important because it demonstrates the level of interest in the U.S. in moving away from the use of petroleum.  If 56,000 people have already pre-ordered a Leaf, many more are interested and many, many more may consider purchasing an EV in a few years.  This represents a paradigm shift which will be beneficial for the economy, security, and public health of our country.

EVs present an opportunity for more of our transportation energy to be produced domestically.  This means more secure lines of energy since we won’t be as reliant on oil imports. (For a great visual, check out the Rocky Mountain Institute’s oil imports map tool.)  Bringing renewables like solar and wind into this equation means more jobs as thousands of new systems are installed.  Renewables will also help to stabilize energy prices – since they provide predictable flows of energy, they will counteract the volatility of energy prices like that of oil. Read more…